Ever notice how some agency strategy meetings feel like a group hug, minus the actual hugging but with way more buzzwords? If you keep leaving these sessions without a single eyebrow raised or uncomfortable moment, congratulations. You may have just rebranded inaction as unity.
The danger here isn't obvious at first. Playing it safe feels smart. It feels collaborative. But it also means you're blending right in with every other agency brave enough to, well, blend in.
Think about it this way. You're faced with two paths. One is the safe, well-lit, "everyone's welcome" road. Cozy for sure, but don't expect anyone to remember you traveled it. The other path asks you to pick a side, say no to things, and maybe even start a tiny office argument or two.
Being agreeable feels way less stressful in the moment. It's also how agencies earn that "forgettable" badge nobody wants. The ones that dare to disagree and make hard calls? Those are the teams you frantically Google after hearing someone mention them at a conference.
Let me show you how and why inviting disagreement (and maybe even a little eye-rolling) could become your agency's unfair advantage. I've rounded up five practical tools for getting real about tradeoffs and making moves that other agencies are too nervous to attempt.
Hot take: If your strategy sessions leave everyone in total agreement, you're not strategizing. You're wish-casting.
Why most agency strategies are just decorated wish lists
Plenty of agency "strategies" are wish lists with extra PowerPoint slides and fancier fonts. The real thing looks completely different. It looks more like calculated risk-taking: picking your bets, annoying a few people in the process, and living with the consequences.
Seriously, if your plan looks like it could be pulled straight from a generic best-practices playbook, it probably was. The only strategy that actually counts is the kind you can test, quantify, and defend, even when that means skipping the mutual appreciation society moment.
Real strategy creates friction. It forces choices that make team members squirm. It causes some potential clients to walk away, sometimes before the first call ends. When you start hearing phrases like "but what if we're missing opportunities" or "this feels uncomfortably narrow," you're probably onto something valuable.
I've learned this the hard way. The strategies that felt too safe, too inclusive, too "let's keep all our options open" were the ones that went exactly nowhere. The uncomfortable ones? Those moved the needle.
1. Name who you exclude (and actually exclude them)
If your target audience description is "anyone with a credit card and a pulse," let's be real. You don't have a target. You have wishful thinking dressed up as market research.
Meet the concept of the "No-ICP," which is the somewhat brave act of publicly stating who you're not for. Maybe you won't take clients smaller than $2M in revenue. Maybe you pass on anything crypto-flavored or anything requiring weekend war rooms. This isn't about door-slamming for the dramatic effect. It's about choosing to go deep instead of wide and stop wasting everyone's time in the process.
Make these exclusions visible. Put them on your website. Bake them into your sales call scripts. I've seen agencies create a literal "We Don't Work With" section on their About page. Include it early in discovery calls: "Before we dive into your needs, here's who we typically don't work with and why."
The magic happens in two ways. First, prospects who aren't a fit self-select out before they waste your time with a three-month sales cycle. Second, the right prospects lean in harder because exclusivity signals real expertise. Your claim to being different only works if you actively show what doesn't make the cut.
Here's a metric worth tracking: your exclusion rate. Pull it monthly. If fewer than 20% of your inquiries get turned away, you're probably not being selective enough. That percentage should make you slightly nervous. If it doesn't, you're still trying to be everything to everyone.
2. Force your resources to actually move (not just your talking points)
Want to see if your strategy has any teeth? Don't look at your vision deck or mission statement. Look at the actual budget, staff allocation, and honestly, your agency's Google Calendar.
Try running what I call a "Budget Reallocation and Calendar Reality Test." Pull last year's spending, compare it to this year, and track whether you're actually cutting time and money from areas you claim to be "pivoting away from." Dream of B2B SaaS domination? Then stop taking e-commerce work and literally move your team away from it, even when the projects look tempting.
Yes, this feels like financial self-sabotage at first. You're turning down revenue. You're saying no to work that would keep people billable. But here's what I've noticed: the specialists who commit to this approach are the ones winning bigger contracts later.
Create a quarterly resource audit for yourself. What percentage of billable hours actually went to your stated focus area? How much of your marketing budget genuinely supports your positioning versus just keeping general lights on? Get specific with the numbers.
If those numbers don't match your strategy deck, you're fooling yourself. Nobody else, just yourself. Real strategic moves show up in expense reports, timesheets, and resource allocation spreadsheets, not just in meeting notes and Slack announcements. Strategy is measured in resources actually redirected, not in "synergy" slides that make everyone feel productive.
3. Red Team exercises and pre-mortems (because agreement is overrated)
Want a harsh but genuinely valuable reality check? Invite your own people to tear up your plans on purpose. I know how this sounds. Stay with me.
Assign a couple of sharp team members to go full "Red Team" mode and attack your beloved new direction as if they were a rival agency trying to expose every weakness. Combine this with a pre-mortem exercise where you imagine the strategy failed spectacularly 18 months from now, then work backward listing every possible reason why it crashed and burned.
Is this atmosphere fun? Absolutely not. Is it necessary if you want a strategy stronger than your office Wi-Fi signal? Yes, completely.
Structure this as a formal quarterly exercise, not just a casual brainstorm. Give your Red Team an actual budget to research competitors and market conditions. Let them present their case against your strategy directly to leadership. Make it formal enough that people take it seriously. Document everything that surfaces, especially the ugly bits, and resist the urge to sweep uncomfortable truths under the rug.
The goal here isn't to kill your strategy before it launches. It's to pressure-test it until you find the real weak spots before your market finds them for you. If your big idea survives active, intelligent dissent from people who know your business, that's when you know it actually stands a chance outside your company Slack channels and internal presentations.
I started doing this about two years ago, and the first session was genuinely uncomfortable. But it caught three major blindspots we would have hit six months into execution. Worth every awkward moment.
4. Keep an actual tradeoff ledger (don't just talk about sacrifice)
Documenting your sacrifices isn't a drama queen move or performance art. It's strategy made visible and accountable.
The Tradeoff Ledger is a living document, ideally a simple one-pager, tracking every real bet you've made, each thing you've deliberately cut, and the tangible costs involved. Here's what a real entry looks like: "Killed all non-core service launches for 2024 so we can double down on retainer relationships. Estimated cost: $180K in potential project revenue we're walking away from."
Make it specific and measurable enough that anyone reading it understands exactly what you sacrificed. Include opportunity costs, team member reactions, and any client pushback you encountered. Review this document out loud, in front of leadership, every month. When people actually see what's been cut and at what price, they understand you're playing for real stakes.
Add a "Confidence Score" to each tradeoff decision. On a scale of one to ten, how sure are you this sacrifice was worth it? Track these scores over time as results come in. You'll start seeing patterns in what kinds of bets consistently pay off for your specific agency versus which ones looked good on paper but tanked in reality.
Here's the distinction that matters: agencies that talk about tradeoffs in meetings feel smart. Agencies that publish and track their tradeoffs become trusted by their teams and their market. The difference is everything.
5. Make the "Stop Doing" list a public event
Want people to finally take your strategy seriously instead of nodding politely? Broadcast what you're not offering anymore.
Every agency is addicted to "To Do" lists. We love them. They make us feel productive. But the bold agencies maintain a prominent "Stop Doing" list that's visible to everyone. Maybe you're quitting discovery audits. Sunsetting free consultations. Finally burying that service literally no one has wanted since 2019 but keeps hanging around your website like a ghost.
Make it awkward in the best possible way. Send a client email announcing discontinued services. Update your website to include a "Previously Offered" section with honest explanations of why you moved on. Don't hide these decisions. Feature them.
Create actual ceremony around these choices. I know agencies that hold "service funerals" where they officially retire offerings that no longer serve their positioning. It sounds ridiculous until you see how seriously the team starts taking strategic decisions afterward. Document the reasoning behind each retirement and share it with your team and your market.
People inside and outside your agency will get the memo that you mean business. Putting your "no longer available" list on public display is the ultimate proof that your positioning isn't just talk. It's backed by real decisions with real consequences.
Great agencies win by doubling down relentlessly on their best bets, even when that means making the status quo deeply uncomfortable for a while.
How to apply strategic tradeoffs and actually stand out
Here's the reality I've come to accept: winning is basically an allergic reaction to compromise. If you want your agency to escape the sea of sameness, you need to bring tradeoffs into the light, encourage a little respectful conflict, and squeeze the absolute most from what you do best.
Pick one tool from this list and actually try it this month. Not eventually. This month. Maybe you draft your No-ICP and get feedback. Maybe you run your first Red Team roast session. Maybe you compile and share your "Stop Doing" list at your next all-hands meeting.
A baby step is still forward motion. Just make sure it's the kind of step your competitors will notice and maybe even envy a little. The goal isn't perfection right out of the gate. It's differentiation through decisive action that compounds over time.
Join the Dynamic Agency Community
Want to hang out with other agency leaders who believe mediocrity should be a crime?
Come join the Dynamic Agency Community for more practical advice, sharper strategic insights, and absolutely zero sugarcoating of hard truths. Because building a remarkable agency is way easier when you're surrounded by people asking the same uncomfortable questions.
